I fundamentally agree with the idea Balazs presents in this essay: that sound is a complex
and powerful cinematic tool -- one which has not often been fully utilized in the near 100 years since it entered the filmmaker's toolkit. When
film made the transition from silent to sound, it simultaneously gained
potential depth and lost expressive power. Where before sound, filmmakers were required
to use their ingenuity to convey the auditory qualities of a scene, this new technology allowed
artists to simply convey the sound itself in their works.
While
something was absolutely lost in that transition, I believe that sound as a
tool can add immeasurable amounts of complexity to a film. The limitations of silent film absolutely encouraged creative expression, but sound itself has provided even more opportunities for film to grow as a medium.
Balazs explores a few
of the ways that sound can enrich cinema in unexpected, and under-utilized
ways. Reading this piece made me excited for the possibilities of sound in my
own projects, and in film as a whole. It made me feel as though the options laid
out before me as a filmmaker are more limitless than I previously thought, like discovering a color
never before seen on your pallet half way through a painting.
"...like discovering a color never before seen on your pallet half way through a painting." THIS! Joy!
ReplyDelete